Questions Regarding Determining Taxable Income
1) Should I use the rules found in 26 USC Â§ 861(b), and the related regulations beginning at 26 CFR Â§ 1.861-8, to determine my taxable domestic income?
2) If some individualsâ€”including myselfâ€”should not use those sections for determining their taxable domestic income, please show me where the regulations say who should or should not use those sections for that.
** Reason for first two questions: The regulations under 26 USC Â§ 861(b) (26 CFR Â§ 1.861-8 and following) begin by stating that Sections 861(b) and 863(a) state in general terms â€œhow to determine taxable income of a taxpayer from sources within the United Statesâ€ after gross income from the U.S. has been determined. (The regulations then say that Sections 862(b) and 863(a) describe how to determine taxable income from outside of the U.S.) Section 1.861-1(a)(1) of the regulations confirms that â€œtaxable income from sources within the United Statesâ€ is to be determined in accordance with the rules of 26 USC Â§ 861(b) and 26 CFR Â§ 1.861-8. (See also 26 CFR Â§Â§ 1.862-1(b), 1.863-1(c).)
3) If a U.S. citizen lives and works exclusively within the 50 states, and receives all of his income from within the 50 states, do 26 USC Â§ 861(b) and 26 CFR Â§ 1.861-8 show such income to be taxable?
** Reason for question: Section 217 of the Revenue Act of 1921, statutory predecessor of 26 USC Â§ 861 and following, stated that income from within the U.S. was taxable for foreigners and for U.S. citizens and corporations deriving most of their income from federal possessions (but did not say the same about the domestic income of most Americans). The regulations under the equivalent section of the 1939 Code (e.g. Â§Â§ 29.119-1, 29.119-2, 29.119-9, 29.119-10 (1945)) showed the same thing. The current regulations at 1.861-8 still show income to be taxable only when derived from certain â€œspecific sources and activities,â€ which, concerning domestic income, still relate only to foreigners and certain Americans receiving income from federal possessions (26 CFR Â§Â§ 1.861-8(a)(1), 1.861-8(a)(4), 1.861-8(f)(1)).
4) Should one refer to 26 CFR Â§ 1.861-8T(d)(2) to determine whether the â€œitemsâ€ of income he receives (such as compensation, interest, rents, dividends, etc.) are excluded for federal income tax purposes?
** Reason for question: The regulations (26 CFR Â§ 1.861-8(a)(3)) state that a â€œclass of gross incomeâ€ consists of the â€œitemsâ€ of income listed in 26 USC Â§ 61 (e.g. compensation, interest, etc.). The regulations (26 CFR Â§Â§ 1.861-8(b)(1)) then direct the reader to â€œparagraph (d)(2)â€ of the section, which provides that such â€œclasses of gross incomeâ€ may include some income which is excluded for federal income tax purposes.
5) What is the purpose of the list of non-exempt types of income found in 26 CFR Â§ 1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii), and why is the income of the average American not on that list?
** Reason for question: After defining â€œexempt incomeâ€ to mean income which is exempt, eliminated, or excluded for federal income tax purposes (26 CFR Â§ 1.861-8T(d)(2)(ii)), the regulations give a list of types of income which are not exempt (i.e. which are subject to tax), which includes the domestic income of foreigners, certain foreign income of Americans, income of certain possessions corporations, and income of international and foreign sales corporations, but which does not include the domestic income of the average American (26 CFR Â§ 1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii)).
6) What types of income (if any) are not exempted from taxation by any statute, but are nonetheless â€œexcluded by lawâ€ (not subject to the federal income tax) because they are, under the Constitution, not taxable by the federal government?
** Reason for question: Older income tax regulations defining â€œgross incomeâ€ and â€œnet incomeâ€ said that neither income exempted by statute â€œor fundamental lawâ€ were subject to the tax (Â§ 39.21-1 (1956)), and said that in addition to those types of income exempted by statute, other types of income were exempt because they were, â€œunder the Constitution, not taxable by the Federal Governmentâ€ (Â§ 39.22(b)-1 (1956)).